Portál AbcLinuxu, 7. května 2025 20:07
# ping 188.167.44.1 PING 188.167.44.1 (188.167.44.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1971 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=966 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=1300 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=339 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=1785 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=2155 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=2171 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=1756 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=907 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=1265 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=255 time=442 ms 64 bytes from 188.167.44.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=255 time=532 ms ^C --- 188.167.44.1 ping statistics --- 18 packets transmitted, 12 received, 33% packet loss, time 17204ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 339.095/1299.635/2171.913/639.103 ms, pipe 3188.167.44.1 je gateway, ktoru mi prideli ich DHCP server. Stretli ste sa niekto s niecim podobnym ? Menil som modem, ten stary robil to iste. Technika k tomu volat nechcem kedze vypadok je nahodny a trva kratko a zrejme by som platil neopravneny vyjazd hoci chyba je na ich strane.
Je jisté, že se nejedná o "Puma modem chipset bug", viz např. tady a tady?
Tj.
The Intel Puma chip is a abysmal failure in so many different ways its shocking that such a poorly engineered chip has been used so widely in the industry and yet fully certified for use by CableLabs. Its also quite shocking that performance testing is not done by CableLabs as part of certification. A DOCSIS 3.0 device could deliver only 200Mbps of UDP and still pass certification even tho it performs at 1/5 the performance it should (Intel Puma 6 ) and wont meet consumer expectations at all while causing MSOs vastly increased support tickets and overhead costs. ...
Tiskni
Sdílej:
ISSN 1214-1267, (c) 1999-2007 Stickfish s.r.o.