Portál AbcLinuxu, 10. května 2025 06:11
# SPF # Note that the benefit for a valid SPF record is deliberately minimal; it's # likely that more spammers would quickly move to setting valid SPF records # otherwise. The penalties for an *incorrect* record, however, are large. ;) ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF score SPF_PASS -0.001 score SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 # gen:mutable score SPF_FAIL 2.600 0.992 1.669 0.693 score SPF_HELO_FAIL 2.298 0.365 0.540 0.001 score SPF_HELO_NEUTRAL 2.231 2.000 0.744 0.576 score SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL 2.599 1.533 1.427 0.841 score SPF_NEUTRAL 2.199 1.210 0.756 0.686 score SPF_SOFTFAIL 2.301 0.654 0.698 0.596 # gen:mutable endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPFJeste mne nekdo upozornil ze kdybych pouzil omezeni primo v postfixu pomoci smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_policy_service unix:private/policy-spf tak tim nebudu kontrolovat pouze validitu sve domeny, ale automaticky vsech ostatnich pri prijmu posty. A kdyz nekdo nebude mit nastaven spf zaznam v domene tak to odmitne. Muzete mi to vysvetlit. Uz jsem z toho docela naprasky. Spamuje nas tady jeden hajzl zpravama typu job pishing ( s adresou odesilatele z nasi adresy) a SA mu dava score pouze mezi 4 - 6. Uz to delal pred 2 tydny. Tento tyden zacal znova Dekuji za kazdou radu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.501 tagged_above=2 required=4 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]A zadne SPF_FAIL ?????
:0:
* ^Received-SPF: fail
$DEFAULT/.spam/
Tiskni
Sdílej:
ISSN 1214-1267, (c) 1999-2007 Stickfish s.r.o.