Administrace komentářů

Ahoj
pouzivam ARCHa od kvetna 2007 na 64-bitech a nezaznamenal jsem zadny problem (Jeden cas jsem mel problemy s kompilaci, ale mohly za to bugy v GCC 4.0., ted co je 4.2.1 je vse OK). Jinak budes mit problemy s tim, ze neni flash pro 64-bit- ale existuje nahrada 'gnash' a udajne ve FF nefunguje ani JAVA. Ta funguje v Konqueroru. Ja Flash nepouzivam, tak mi nevadi. A taky WINE (neni pro 64-bit. OS, ale daji se dohrat knihovny (multilib) pro 32-bit rezim, ze ktereho vse jede, ale neni to pak cisty 64-bit OS.

What will I miss in Arch64?

The following applications are known not to be 64-bit compatible:

    * no Java plugin shipped by Sun; KDE's Konqueror has its own native running 64-bit JavaPlugin built in! Best solution to browse JavaApplets
       these days.
    * true x86_64 Flash support only in parts with GPL gnash package from extra repo
    * no native Flash plugin shipped by Macromedia/Adobe - nspluginwrapper package from community allows use of 32-bit plugins but forces    
      installation of lib32 packages - follow this guide on how to Install Flash on Arch64
    * Closed-source apps like Skype, Opera - where they don't provide 100% statically built binaries so 32-bit libs are still needed
    * additional win32 codecs (... that nobody really needs)
    * packages that use x86 32-bit assembler code (some emulators like zsnes and syslinux) 

Z hlediska stability je to velmi stabilni a pruzny system, nemam problemy ohledne stability. Pokud tedy nevyuzijes nejake vyse uvedene aplikace, tak smele do toho, nebo si nahrej nezbytne 32-bit knihovny a pak to pujde take spustit. (Ale pak je 64-bit snad i zbytecny). Rozhodne vyzkousej